With the videogame market flooded with more violent games, it can be a constant struggle for parents to monitor and limit their children's video-gaming.
   But a recent US Supreme Court decision doesn't help parents. The ruling struck down California's 2010 law that had prevented the sale or rental to those younger than 18 of violent games. The majority opinion said such limits went against First Amendment rights. So, parents, it's up to you to fight against the influences of the＄18 billion video-gaming industry.
   With so many video and computer games easily accessible, that monitoring role isn't easy. It's not just a matter of saying “no” to children, say psychologists. Some parents who shun government involvement in such matters welcomed the ruling, even while hating violent video games.
“It's a parent's responsibility to teach them what they should watch and use,” said Ruth Forster, 45, Avon, Her daughter, Ellie, 13, doesn't like to play video games now, but Forster monitors her daughter's movies and books. “Parents need to see how children react to a video and how it affects them,” she advised. “There are other video games out there you can help them to choose. Hopefully, if you instilled(灌输)enough good things in them, they'll do the right thing.” Parents need to be aware of the games their children are playing and how long they’re playing, and make sure the games are appropriate for their ages and personalities, she said.
   It’s not hard to find reviews, ratings(分级) and details about games. Video-game ratings by the Entertainment Software Rating Board, give consumers an idea of the level of violence, sexual content and bad language. Videos with a rating of “M” for mature, for example, are said to be suitable for people 17 and older. But the system is voluntary, so younger children can buy or rent “M”-rated games. But it’s not enough to rely completely on the ratings.   

【考点】细节理解，主旨大意，社会现象类阅读，猜测词义

【分析】请登陆后查看

【解答】请登陆后查看